Analisis Perbandingan Metode MAUT dan OCRA dalam Rekomendasi Produk Tabir Surya Terbaik


Authors

  • Amran Saleh Harahap Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia
  • Dewi Maulida Sari Tanjung Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia
  • Soeb Aripin Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64366/dss.v1i2.37

Keywords:

Decision Support System; Sunscreen Products; MAUT Method; OCRA Method

Abstract

This research aims to conduct a comparative analysis between the MAUT (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory) and OCRA (Order of Comparative Risk Assessment) methods in the context of recommending the best sunscreen products. A Decision Support System (DSS) is employed as the underlying tool for selecting the most suitable products based on predefined criteria. The research findings indicate that both methods yield the same best alternative, which is the product "The Originote" with an A8 ranking. The MAUT method produces the best preference value of 0.53, while the OCRA method yields the best preference value of 2.455. These results reveal that in the data testing conducted, the OCRA method takes the first rank with higher preferences compared to the MAUT method. This research offers valuable insights into the selection of the best sunscreen products by utilizing two different methods, which can assist consumers and stakeholders in making more informed and data-driven decisions. These findings can serve as a basis for further developments in decision analysis methods within the context of sunscreen products and similar items.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. ALIFIYA, “Formulasi Dan Uji Stabilitas Fisik Sediaan Krim Tabir Surya Berbahan Aktif Kombinasi Ekstrak Bunga Telang (Clitoria Ternatea) Dan Lidah Buaya (Aloe Vera).” Uin Raden Intan Lampung, 2022.

R. Y. Rubinstein and B. Melamed, Modern simulation and modeling, vol. 7. Wiley New York, 1998.

N. S. SINAGA, “Gambaran Pengetahuan Sikap dan Tindakan Terhadap Penggunaan Sunscreen Pada Siswi SMA N 1 Aek Songsongan,” 2020.

A. Karim, S. Esabella, K. Kusmanto, M. Mesran, and U. Hasanah, “Analisa Penerapan Metode Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis (OCRA) dan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Dalam Pemilihan Calon Karyawan Tetap Menerapkan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid (ROC),” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1674–1687, 2021.

W. Harry, B. Lumban, R. Adrian, F. S. Simanjuntak, and K. Yudha, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Mahasiswa Penerima Bantuan UKT Dengan Menerapkan Metode ROC dan MAUT,” pp. 15–21, 2021.

H. Syahputra, M. Syahrizal, S. Suginam, S. D. Nasution, and B. Purba, “SPK Pemilihan Konten Youtube Layak Tonton Untuk Anak-Anak Menerapkan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS),” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Komput. Sains, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 678–685, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://prosiding.seminar-id.com/index.php/sainteks/article/view/215/210

A. Triayudi, D. Nofrisa, and R. Fadillah, “Penerapan Metode EXPROM II Dalam Menentukan Tempat Wisata Pantai Terbaik,” vol. 5, pp. 337–346, 2023, doi: 10.30865/json.v5i2.6925.

M. M. Saw, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Dosen Non Komputer Terbaik,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 30–36, 2023.

M. A. Abdullah and R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapan Metode MOOSRA Dalam Penentuan Penerimaan Frontliner Menggunakan Pembobotan Metode ROC,” J. Ris. Komputer), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 330–337, 2023, doi: 10.30865/jurikom.v10i1.5647.

A. Iskandar, “Penyeleksian Penerimaan Teleservice Representative dengan Penerapan Metode ARAS dan Pembobotan ROC,” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 548–557, 2023.

J. Afriany, K. Tampubolon, and R. Fadillah, “Penerapan Metode TOPSIS Penentuan Pemberian Mikro Faedah Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI),” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 129–137, 2021.

N. R. Yanifa, D. Arifianto, and A. Nilogiri, “Implementasi Metode Moora (Multi – Objective Optimization On The Basis Of Ratio Analysis) Pada Penerimaan Beasiswa Di Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember Berbasis Web,” Tek. Inform., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 20–48, 2019.

R. K. Hondro and S. Arifin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Team Leader Menggunakan Metode MOOSRA,” vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2022.

M. F. Penta, F. B. Siahaan, and S. H. Sukamana, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode SAW pada PT. Kujang Sakti Anugrah,” JSAI (Journal Sci. Appl. Informatics), vol. 2, no. 3, 2019.

D. H. Ramadan, M. R. Siregar, and S. Ramadan, “Penerapan Metode MAUT Dalam Penentuan Kelayakan TKI dengan Pembobotan ROC,” vol. 6, pp. 1789–1795, 2022, doi: 10.30865/mib.v6i3.4441.

S. Rihastuti, “Penerapan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory dalam Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik di STMIK Amikom Surakarta,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2019.

A. Sciences, “ELECTRONIC DEVICE SELECTION IN INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS AND MACHINERY INDUSTRY?: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WITH OCRA AND MAUT,” pp. 119–134, 2019.

N. Hadinata, “Implementasi Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Menentukan Penerima Kredit,” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 87–92, 2018, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v7i2.562.

S. S. Hasibuan, “Penerapan Metode Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis (OCRA) Dalam Keputusan Rekomendasi Mutasi Jabatan Karyawan,” Bull. Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2021.

A. FITRIA, “Uji Aktivitas Tabir Surya Kombinasi Ekstrak Bunga Telang (Clitoria Ternatea) Dan Lidah Buaya (Aloe Vera) Secara Invitro Menggunakan Spektrofotometer UV-Vis.” UIN RADEN INTAN LAMPUNG, 2022.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Analisis Perbandingan Metode MAUT dan OCRA dalam Rekomendasi Produk Tabir Surya Terbaik

Dimensions Badge

ARTICLE HISTORY

Published: 2024-01-30

Abstract View: 241 times
PDF Download: 55 times

How to Cite

Harahap, A. S., Tanjung, D. M. S., & Soeb Aripin. (2024). Analisis Perbandingan Metode MAUT dan OCRA dalam Rekomendasi Produk Tabir Surya Terbaik. Journal of Decision Support System Research, 1(2), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.64366/dss.v1i2.37