Analisis Perbandingan Metode MAUT dan OCRA dalam Rekomendasi Produk Tabir Surya Terbaik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64366/dss.v1i2.37Keywords:
Decision Support System; Sunscreen Products; MAUT Method; OCRA MethodAbstract
This research aims to conduct a comparative analysis between the MAUT (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory) and OCRA (Order of Comparative Risk Assessment) methods in the context of recommending the best sunscreen products. A Decision Support System (DSS) is employed as the underlying tool for selecting the most suitable products based on predefined criteria. The research findings indicate that both methods yield the same best alternative, which is the product "The Originote" with an A8 ranking. The MAUT method produces the best preference value of 0.53, while the OCRA method yields the best preference value of 2.455. These results reveal that in the data testing conducted, the OCRA method takes the first rank with higher preferences compared to the MAUT method. This research offers valuable insights into the selection of the best sunscreen products by utilizing two different methods, which can assist consumers and stakeholders in making more informed and data-driven decisions. These findings can serve as a basis for further developments in decision analysis methods within the context of sunscreen products and similar items.
Downloads
References
M. ALIFIYA, “Formulasi Dan Uji Stabilitas Fisik Sediaan Krim Tabir Surya Berbahan Aktif Kombinasi Ekstrak Bunga Telang (Clitoria Ternatea) Dan Lidah Buaya (Aloe Vera).” Uin Raden Intan Lampung, 2022.
R. Y. Rubinstein and B. Melamed, Modern simulation and modeling, vol. 7. Wiley New York, 1998.
N. S. SINAGA, “Gambaran Pengetahuan Sikap dan Tindakan Terhadap Penggunaan Sunscreen Pada Siswi SMA N 1 Aek Songsongan,” 2020.
A. Karim, S. Esabella, K. Kusmanto, M. Mesran, and U. Hasanah, “Analisa Penerapan Metode Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis (OCRA) dan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Dalam Pemilihan Calon Karyawan Tetap Menerapkan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid (ROC),” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1674–1687, 2021.
W. Harry, B. Lumban, R. Adrian, F. S. Simanjuntak, and K. Yudha, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Mahasiswa Penerima Bantuan UKT Dengan Menerapkan Metode ROC dan MAUT,” pp. 15–21, 2021.
H. Syahputra, M. Syahrizal, S. Suginam, S. D. Nasution, and B. Purba, “SPK Pemilihan Konten Youtube Layak Tonton Untuk Anak-Anak Menerapkan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS),” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Komput. Sains, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 678–685, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://prosiding.seminar-id.com/index.php/sainteks/article/view/215/210
A. Triayudi, D. Nofrisa, and R. Fadillah, “Penerapan Metode EXPROM II Dalam Menentukan Tempat Wisata Pantai Terbaik,” vol. 5, pp. 337–346, 2023, doi: 10.30865/json.v5i2.6925.
M. M. Saw, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Dosen Non Komputer Terbaik,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 30–36, 2023.
M. A. Abdullah and R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapan Metode MOOSRA Dalam Penentuan Penerimaan Frontliner Menggunakan Pembobotan Metode ROC,” J. Ris. Komputer), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 330–337, 2023, doi: 10.30865/jurikom.v10i1.5647.
A. Iskandar, “Penyeleksian Penerimaan Teleservice Representative dengan Penerapan Metode ARAS dan Pembobotan ROC,” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 548–557, 2023.
J. Afriany, K. Tampubolon, and R. Fadillah, “Penerapan Metode TOPSIS Penentuan Pemberian Mikro Faedah Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI),” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 129–137, 2021.
N. R. Yanifa, D. Arifianto, and A. Nilogiri, “Implementasi Metode Moora (Multi – Objective Optimization On The Basis Of Ratio Analysis) Pada Penerimaan Beasiswa Di Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember Berbasis Web,” Tek. Inform., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 20–48, 2019.
R. K. Hondro and S. Arifin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Team Leader Menggunakan Metode MOOSRA,” vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2022.
M. F. Penta, F. B. Siahaan, and S. H. Sukamana, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode SAW pada PT. Kujang Sakti Anugrah,” JSAI (Journal Sci. Appl. Informatics), vol. 2, no. 3, 2019.
D. H. Ramadan, M. R. Siregar, and S. Ramadan, “Penerapan Metode MAUT Dalam Penentuan Kelayakan TKI dengan Pembobotan ROC,” vol. 6, pp. 1789–1795, 2022, doi: 10.30865/mib.v6i3.4441.
S. Rihastuti, “Penerapan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory dalam Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik di STMIK Amikom Surakarta,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2019.
A. Sciences, “ELECTRONIC DEVICE SELECTION IN INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS AND MACHINERY INDUSTRY?: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WITH OCRA AND MAUT,” pp. 119–134, 2019.
N. Hadinata, “Implementasi Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Menentukan Penerima Kredit,” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 87–92, 2018, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v7i2.562.
S. S. Hasibuan, “Penerapan Metode Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis (OCRA) Dalam Keputusan Rekomendasi Mutasi Jabatan Karyawan,” Bull. Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2021.
A. FITRIA, “Uji Aktivitas Tabir Surya Kombinasi Ekstrak Bunga Telang (Clitoria Ternatea) Dan Lidah Buaya (Aloe Vera) Secara Invitro Menggunakan Spektrofotometer UV-Vis.” UIN RADEN INTAN LAMPUNG, 2022.
Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini
Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Analisis Perbandingan Metode MAUT dan OCRA dalam Rekomendasi Produk Tabir Surya Terbaik
ARTICLE HISTORY
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Amran Saleh Harahap, Dewi Maulida Sari Tanjung, Soeb Aripin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).






