Comparison of WSM and Weight Product Methods with WSM-Score and Vector Approaches


Authors

  • Roziyani Setik Visual Art and Computing Universiti, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Asyahri Hadi Nasyuha Universitas Teknologi Digital Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Sri Redjeki Universitas Teknologi Digital Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64366/ijids.v2i1.63

Keywords:

DSS; Firtilizer; WSM; WP

Abstract

Fertilizer is a material that is given to the soil or plants to meet the nutritional needs of the plant. Fertilization needs to be carried out rationally according to the needs of the plant. In the supply of fertilizers, farmers have difficulty in determining the best fertilizer for their plants, making it difficult to choose which fertilizers are good for their plants. In determining the best fertilizer, the decision support system (DSS) can be used as an alternative to help someone make decisions more effectively and efficiently by utilizing certain data and models. To solve the existing problems, it is necessary to conduct research in decision making using the Weighted Sum Model (WSM) and Weight Product (WP) Methods which can produce decisions based on the best fertilizer criteria that will be purchased by customers. The Weighted Sum Model (WSM) method is one of the simplest and easiest methods to understand its application, this method is also part of the MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision Making) method in evaluating the value of each alternative. The Weight Product (WP) method is a method using multiplication to relate the attribute rating, where the rating of each attribute must be ranked with the attribute weight in question. From the results of the implementation of this system, it can be concluded that using the Weighted Sum Model and Weight Product method can help customers in the decision-making process for choosing the best fertilizer to use on their plants.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. Noulas, S. Torabian, dan R. Qin, “Crop nutrient requirements and advanced fertilizer management strategies,” Agronomy, vol. 13, no. 8, hal. 1–10, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13082017.

R. Pajura, A. Mas?o?, dan J. Czarnota, “The use of waste to produce liquid fertilizers in terms of sustainable development and energy consumption in the fertilizer industry—A case study from Poland,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 4, hal. 1–24, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041747.

Z. Bashir, Arbeena, Q.-U.- Ain, B. Rashi, dan M. Nisa, “Organic Fertilizers: Types and Benefits of Organic Fertilizers,” in Organic Farming, 1st Editio., CRC Press, 2025, hal. 80–118.

C. A. Jote, “The impacts of using inorganic chemical fertilizers on the environment and human health,” Org. Med. Chem. Int. J., vol. 13, no. 3, hal. 1–8, 2023, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.19080/OMCIJ.2023.13.555864.

A. K. Yadav, G. G. Gurnule, N. I. Gour, U. There, dan V. C. Choudhar, “Micronutrients and fertilizers for improving and maintaining crop value: a review,” Int. J. Environ. Agric. Biotechnol., vol. 7, no. 1, hal. 125–140, 2022, doi: 10.22161/ijeab.

J. Lian et al., “Impact of long-term application of manure and inorganic fertilizers on common soil bacteria in different soil types,” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., vol. 337, hal. 108044, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108044.

D. Panday, N. Bhusal, S. Das, dan A. Ghalehgolabbehbahani, “Rooted in nature: the rise, challenges, and potential of organic farming and fertilizers in agroecosystems,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 4, hal. 1–25, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041530.

A. Bhadu, B. Singh, T. Gulshan, S. N. Kumawat, R. K. Choudhary, dan F. Farooq, “Customized fertilizer: a key for enhanced crop production,” Int. J. Plant Soil Sci., vol. 34, no. 23, hal. 954–964, 2022, doi: 10.9734/IJPSS/2022/v34i232505.

N. L. Fitriyani, M. Syafrudin, G. Alfian, dan J. Rhee, “HDPM: An Effective Heart Disease Prediction Model for a Clinical Decision Support System,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, hal. 133034–133050, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3010511.

E. K. Zavadskas, P. Vaini?nas, Z. Turskis, dan J. Tamošaitien?, “Multiple criteria decision support system for assessment of projects managers in construction,” Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak., vol. 11, no. 2, hal. 501–520, 2012, doi: 10.1142/S0219622012400135.

D. Librado, T. Prabawa, dan H. A. Triyanto, “Klasterisasi Penerima Bantuan Sosial Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” JIKO (Jurnal Inform. dan Komputer), vol. 7, no. 1, hal. 30, 2023, doi: 10.26798/jiko.v7i1.677.

A. Fadilla, A. H. Nasyuha, dan V. W. Sari, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Juru Masak (Koki) Menggunakan Metode Complex Proportional Assesment (COPRAS),” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 9, no. 2, hal. 316–327, 2022, doi: 10.30865/jurikom.v9i2.3920.

A. H. Nasyuha, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Pemberian Pinjaman Modal dengan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory,” J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 3, no. 2, Apr 2019, doi: 10.30865/mib.v3i2.1093.

A. Priyamita, A. Amanda, dan A. A. Sitompul, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Penentuan Penambahan Produk Berdasarkan Persentase Penjualan Menggunakan Metode ELECTRE,” Sist. Pendukung Keputusan dengan Apl., vol. 3, no. 2, hal. 114–123, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.55537/spk.v3i2.889.

A. H. Nasyuha, I. Purnama, A. Sidabutar, dan A. Karim, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Kerani Timbang Lapangan Terbaik Menerapkan Metode Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis ( OCRA ),” vol. 6, hal. 355–361, 2022, doi: 10.30865/mib.v6i1.3475.

L. T. Sianturi, “Implementation of Weight Sum Model ( WSM ) in the Selection of Football Athletes,” Int. J. Informatics Comput. Sci. (The IJICS), vol. 3, no. 1, hal. 24–27, 2019.

A. H. Nasyuha, M. Hutasuhut, dan M. Ramadhan, “Penerapan Metode Fuzzy Mamdani Untuk Menentukan Stok Produk Herbal Berdasarkan Permintaan dan Penjualan,” vol. 3, no. 4, hal. 313–323, 2019, doi: 10.30865/mib.v3i4.1354.

L. Abdullah dan C. W. Adawiyah, “Simple Additive Weighting Methods of Multi criteria Decision Making and Applications: A Decade Review,” Int. J. Inf. Process. Manag., vol. 5, no. 1, hal. 39–49, 2014.

Z. Turskis, N. Goranin, A. Nurusheva, dan S. Boranbayev, “A fuzzy WASPAS-based approach to determine critical information infrastructures of EU sustainable development,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11020424.

K. Campbell, D. Massey, M. Broadbent, dan K. A. Clarke, “Factors influencing clinical decision making used by mental health nurses to provide provisional diagnosis: A scoping review,” Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs., vol. 28, no. 2, hal. 407–424, 2019, doi: 10.1111/inm.12553.

F. Aditiya dan M. Mesran, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Calon Peserta Cerdas Cermat Tingkat SMA Menerapkan Metode ROC dan WP,” J. Ris. Tek. Inform. dan Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, hal. 14–20, 2022.

A. Fahrezi, F. N. Salam, G. M. Ibrahim, dan R. Rahman Syaiful, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting, Weighted Product, Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Studi Kasus di PT. Aino Indonesia),” vol. 1, no. 1, hal. 74–83, 2022.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Comparison of WSM and Weight Product Methods with WSM-Score and Vector Approaches

Dimensions Badge

ARTICLE HISTORY

Published: 2024-12-31

Abstract View: 39 times
PDF Download: 46 times

How to Cite

Roziyani Setik, Asyahri Hadi Nasyuha, & Sri Redjeki. (2024). Comparison of WSM and Weight Product Methods with WSM-Score and Vector Approaches. International Journal of Informatics and Data Science, 2(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.64366/ijids.v2i1.63